arrow_back Back to Overview

Indiana Online

IN Sch for the Blind & Vis Imprd

FY 25-26 LIVE Active User · Associate tier Active User · Associate tier IN Sch for the Blind & Vis Imprd · by FY 25–26 enrollments Power Usertop 25% of tier Active Usermiddle 50% Light Userbottom 25% Non-Adopterno enrollments Quartiles of Associate-tier Indiana Online adopters by enrollments
ESC CIESC
Tier Small
ADM 92

verified School Year Completed

IN Sch for the Blind & Vis Imprd · FY 25–26 · school year

groups Total Enrollments
5 enrollments
savings Volume Tier Savings
$125
paid Avg Savings per Enrollment
$25
account_balance Payment Type
100% school-paid
school Your IO Programs · FY 25–26

Enrollments by program this school year

Supplemental: 5 (100.0%)5enrollments
Supplemental 100% 5
Dual Credit 0% 0

5 total enrollments · using 1 of 2 programs

groups Your Programs vs Associate-Tier Districts

Your enrollment vs the tier median, by program

Supplemental · 2 districts
You 5 / 35 limited

Across 2 other Associate-tier districts with students enrolled in Supplemental · small sample, may be noisy

Dual Credit · statewide
You 0 / 13 untapped

Statewide median among 1 district running Dual Credit; you have none this FY

Top Subjects by Enrollment

1 subjects · 1 growing · 0 declining · net +2 enrollments YoY

GROWING
1
+2 enrollments YoY
DECLINING
0
0 enrollments YoY
1 Social Studies
5 +67%

Top Courses by Enrollment

All 1 course

1 Economics (25-26 SY)
5

Enrollment Trend

Active User · Associate tier Active User · Associate tier IN Sch for the Blind & Vis Imprd · by FY 25–26 IO enrollments Power Usertop 25% of tier Active Usermiddle 50% Light Userbottom 25% Non-Adopterno IO enrollments Quartiles of Associate-tier IO adopters by enrollment

School year enrollments — vs same-level peers within the Associate tier

1007550250845FY 23–24FY 24–25FY 25–26
This district Associate-tier adopters median

Same-level cohort too small for a meaningful median — comparing instead vs 1 Associate-tier adopter (all levels). Tier also includes: 1 Power · 0 Light · 2 Non-Adopter.

Adoption Density

IO enrollments per 100 ADM students — penetration normalized for district size

107.55.02.50.08.7-50%4.3+25%5.4FY 23–24FY 24–25FY 25–26

5.4 IO enrollments per 100 students (5 of 92 ADM in FY 25–26). Adoption density normalizes for district size, so a small district at high penetration ranks honestly against a large district with the same per-student rate.

IN Sch for the Blind & Vis Imprd · Indiana Online Last updated just now