arrow_back Back to Overview

Indiana Online

IN Sch for the Blind & Vis Imprd

FY 26-27 LIVE Active User · Associate tier Active User · Associate tier IN Sch for the Blind & Vis Imprd · by FY 26–27 enrollments Power Usertop 25% of tier Active Usermiddle 50% Light Userbottom 25% Non-Adopterno enrollments Quartiles of Associate-tier Indiana Online adopters by enrollments
ESC CIESC
Tier Small
ADM 92

verified School Year Completed

IN Sch for the Blind & Vis Imprd · FY 26–27 · school year

groups Total Enrollments
7 enrollments
savings Volume Tier Savings
$140
paid Avg Savings per Enrollment
$20
account_balance Payment Type
100% school-paid
school Your IO Programs · FY 26–27

Enrollments by program this school year

Supplemental: 7 (100.0%)7enrollments
Supplemental 100% 7

7 total enrollments · using 1 of 1 program

groups Your Programs vs Associate-Tier Districts

Your enrollment vs the tier median, by program

Supplemental · 2 districts
You 7 / 12 limited

Across 2 other Associate-tier districts with students enrolled in Supplemental · small sample, may be noisy

Top Subjects by Enrollment

2 subjects · 1 growing · 1 declining · net +2 enrollments YoY

GROWING
1
+4 enrollments YoY
DECLINING
1
-2 enrollments YoY
1 Science, Technology and Engineering
4 NEW
2 Social Studies
3 -40%

Top Courses by Enrollment

All 2 courses

1 Chemistry I-1 (26-27 SY)
4
2 Economics (26-27 SY)
3

Enrollment Trend

Active User · Associate tier Active User · Associate tier IN Sch for the Blind & Vis Imprd · by FY 26–27 IO enrollments Power Usertop 25% of tier Active Usermiddle 50% Light Userbottom 25% Non-Adopterno IO enrollments Quartiles of Associate-tier IO adopters by enrollment

School year enrollments — vs same-level peers within the Associate tier

10075502508457FY 23–24FY 24–25FY 25–26FY 26–27
This district Associate-tier adopters median

Same-level cohort too small for a meaningful median — comparing instead vs 1 Associate-tier adopter (all levels). Tier also includes: 1 Power · 0 Light · 2 Non-Adopter.

Adoption Density

IO enrollments per 100 ADM students — penetration normalized for district size

107.55.02.50.08.7-50%4.3+25%5.4+40%7.6FY 23–24FY 24–25FY 25–26FY 26–27

7.6 IO enrollments per 100 students (7 of 92 ADM in FY 26–27). Adoption density normalizes for district size, so a small district at high penetration ranks honestly against a large district with the same per-student rate.

IN Sch for the Blind & Vis Imprd · Indiana Online Last updated just now